ADOS

Reposted from Abagond. Off the top of my head, I can’t say much about it right now because I’m up to my neck in other things at the moment (debts, possible eviction, etc.). But I might add that this squabble between native-born Afro-Americans and foreign-born blacks is nothing new. It was happening when I was a kid; it was happening when my father was a kid. In fact Harold Cruse devoted an entire chapter in his book “Crisis of the Negro Intellectual” to the on-going beef between Afro-Americans (Negroes at the time) and Caribbean blacks (West Indians at the time). For example:

“An anti-West Indian bias was implicit in some of the relentless editorial assaults in (A. Phillip) Randolph’s ‘Messenger’ against the Garvey movement, as part of the “Garvey Must Go!” campaign carried out by the American leadership. This campaign reached a high pitch in 1923…Randolph and his group were enraged by Garvey’s words and answered him in the ‘Messenger’ under the editorial heading, ‘A Supreme Negro Jamaican Jackass'”….

And on the flip side of the coin, from Caribbean blacks, Cruse noted that “once a West Indian gets to the United States he becomes critical of Negroes being exploited because they ‘don’t understand business'”….

All in all, it’s just another sad case of American history repeating itself in terms of the Afro-American vis-a-vis other ethnic groups.

Abagond

Household wealth in Boston. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 2015.

ADOS (by 2005) is short for “American Descendants of Slaves”, also known as American DOS, DOS or USDOS, etc. It means US Blacks who come from US slaves. About 90% of Black people in the US are ADOS. The term goes back to at least “America’s Little Black Book” (2005) by Norris Shelton. The term is being pushed on the Internet by Antonio Moore and Yvette Carnell.

Not ADOS:

  • Nigerian Americans because few if any came from slaves.
  • West Indian Americans because they came from non-US slaves.
  • Non-Black people of colour, also not from US slaves. Note that many Native Americans were made into slaves, but their descendants no longer form a separate class in US society.
  • White Americans, many of whom have the blood of Black slaves in them – just ask James Watson – but have…

View original post 452 more words

AFROPUNK harmed way more people than previously reported: staff, community speak out

So it’s official, then: AFROPUNK IS TRASH.

What started out roughly a decade ago as an alternative space for black creatives (largely in Brooklyn) has become a cash cow for black capitalists (aka Amerikkkan Coloreds, aka the Black Bourgeoisie) who traditionally see other Black people as shit. Snotty-nosed hipsters infiltrated the scene early on, it appears, and completely corrupted what should have been a viable Black counter-cultural movement. According to Bae Guevara, a self-styled trap feminist, thug scholar and Harlemite, “Afropunk has always been corny. It isn’t even punk. Just corporate shit backed by white people.”

No shit!

What *is* Black Punk, anyway? What about Bad Brains? The New York Niggers? Living Colour? Eugene Tatu? Sun Ra? (Yes, I know he’s dead, but still.) Punk, by definition, is anarchic, confrontational, rude, nasty, shrill. Punk aims to offend, not please. The Afropunks conflated petty-bourgeois hipsterism and hippie shenanigans (like posing, panting your face, wearing flowers and funny hats and all that silly shit) with authentic punk. You will never find an Afropunk equivalent to Johnny Rotten’s “God Save the Queen” (unless, of course, one is willing to include Nipsey Hustle’s “Fuck Donald Trump” under the umbrella of a Black Punk aesthetic).

Afropunk made its true intent self-evident in its paternalistic attitude towards its followers (note the signs at festivals demanding in shrill Stalinist PC rhetoric NO RACISM, NO HETEROSEXISM, NO FAT SHAMING, NO AGEISM, blah blah blah–as if these clowns were addressing little children)–and its obsequiousness towards White hipster gate-crashers. Of course, these plastic pickaninnies simply wanted White hipster money, which explains why they (plastic punks) eventually shelved their Afrocentric intentions.

In fact, Afropunk became WHITE, a sexified racist minstrel show, pandering to White racist desires for Black exotica, Black obsequiousness and of course, the long-held white racist desire for the PRIMITIVE, CHILDLIKE, HAPPY NEGRO. The Black Bourgeoisie typically tries to conceal its extreme self-loathing behind gay and trans-rights issues, but in this instance (as in the case of Jussie Smolett and DeRay McKesson) the bougies got called out on their fuckery. The sheer vitriol and hate that infests “Shea Butter Twitter” manifested itself in Afropunk’s mental, verbal and physical assaults on its own staff (and others). Afropunk is to Black culture (what’s left of it, which isn’t much) what Kamala Harris is to Afro-Americans in general: a stale Oreo cookie.

The Rad Voice

AP Trumpism Banner 3 #Afropunk=Trumpism stickers were spotted in New York and Atlanta

Former associates, staff members, artists, vendors, festival goers are sharing their Afropunk stories of lies, abuse, conning, threats and more. Many are calling for a boycott.

Event production company Afropunk’s ethos has been called into questions numerous times over the years. Most recently, guests of their Brooklyn festival reported being removed from a backstage area for criticizing the brand, and the long-time Editor-in-Chief of Afropunk’s online media resigned, citing unethical behaviors and performative ‘activism’ coming from the company’s owners and their ‘entourage’.

Many more people are now coming forward with their accounts of how they were mistreated by the corporation and/or its management in this exclusive investigation. Some are speaking here for the first time, some have spoken out before but most of the previous reports, albeit very concerning, didn’t get much traction.

While unethical behavior is not unusual in…

View original post 4,606 more words

Black Mentacide: Accepting Degenerate Ghetto culture

via Black Mentacide: Accepting Degenerate Ghetto culture

See my own 2012 article on Reactionary Rap and the Black Lumpenproletariat. My stance has not changed, except to say that white racist ressentiment is so bad nowadays that even 50 Cent felt compelled to burn his Gucci t-shirt. (Note: Gucci is in hot water for attempting to sneak on the nigger-bashing bandwagon, a la H & M (“coolest monkey in the jungle”), Prada (blackface), and Shirley Q. Liquor, a fat queen who entertains racist gays by ripping off Bert Williams’s old routines.) Even a little worm like Soulja Boy (Ole Mush Mouth) turned.

African-American or New Afrikan ( The Difference Between African American Democratic Movement & New Afrikan Independence Movement )

via African-American or New Afrikan ( The Difference Between African American Democratic Movement & New Afrikan Independence Movement )

There are crucial differences between the Afro-American “Negro” (an assimilationist and compromiser) and a New Afrikan. Suffice it to say that the Afro- or African-American wants to achieve liberation through the same economic superstructure that was (and still is) designed to keep Africans at subsistence level. The African-American loves to believe that the system is broken when in fact, it isn’t–all those filthy ghettos, housing projects, trailer parks, barrios, favelas, reservations; all those homeless lined up along the streets of LA and San Francisco, all those incarcerated black men and battered black women are not indicative of a system that is failing but a system that is running precisely as it was intended to run.

Even the cult-nationalists of the sixties understood this basic fact. Cultural nationalists (such as Amiri Baraka) advocated something called “co-operative economics” as opposed to Capitalism. Baraka, in an interview sometime in the late sixties, dismissed Capitalism as a “byword–a euphemism for evil.” He would have been more precise (as he was later upon converting to Marxism) if he said that Capitalism was a byword for organized barbarism (on the level of the fucking Vandals, and upon reading the history of these barbarians, there is not a bit of difference between Vandalism and Capitalism, save that Capitalism is–ostensibly, anyway–far more sophisticated and elegant in its approach to pillaging nations).